About love

Love can only be exchanged for love, trust with trust, and so on. If you want to influence others, you must have a stimulating and stimulating influence on others. If you love without arousing love, ie if you can not manifest yourself as a loving person, making yourself a loved one, then your love is dull and miserable.

Love in Greek is called Agape which means unselfish love or infinite love. Love is the essence of the most important man. After the character that makes man as a thinking creature, it seems to Marx that this is not enough if it is not based on love. Love is a prerequisite for being human. Marx seems to define love as a human expression of his world (others and nature). The thesis that underlies Marx's thinking is that in the conditions of private ownership there is no love so that economic-political justice and equity of access to the fulfillment of necessities of life are considered closer to the substance of love.

Love thinking is necessary, The search for existential identity is related to knowledge. A person will only 'recognize' something as long as he 'loves it' (res tantum cognoscitur quantum diligitur). 'Knowing' here is not a 'mental mind' activity, because if that happens, the result is 'intellectual knowledge' in the form of ideas in the brain alone. The only love in the brain is not in the heart is dangerous. To "recognize" is to include conscience and the result is inner knowledge that will encourage us to take action that comes from and leads to considerations of conscience. The direction is sure to anything good and noble to humans. The notion of 'pamrih' does not apply - this is 'mahaba' (love) whose center is not the lust of the ego, but the conscience. Because Justice in life is wanting human feelings that can become a home for homeless love.

Is it true Marx said? Let us forget Karl Marx, because we both know that love is not even so. You and I should also know that grips do not forever save what is truly cracked. Even once you and I will try to break the artery, it will not make the difference to be the same. It will still be a line at the limit of keinginanan, and for that believe me.

You and I should know, sometimes your ability to love and long for it cultivates a certain amount of energy to continue to hate later. Although we will never believe, how humans without whom we can expect to love each other earnestly, can also harm one another viciously. If so, how much more wise if love does not have to have, as what is sung by ST 12 in the lyrics of the song.

How is it possible that when the discomfort we have is face to face with ourselves, is there someone else we hope to feel good about ourselves?

Is not loneliness will not find salvation in others? Because of the baseless ignorance then, not just the teenagers who menginjaki puberty, but also the adults who never went wise. Whereas the self is the emptiness, so that every other human being that is inherent in our lives must always be submissive and become his own.

Only people with infinite ignorance feel jealousy as a reasonable justification for taking the rights of people. There is no sweetness of posesivitas. There is no sweetness of lame power. The funny thing is, there are still a lot of dumb people who meet other fools. meet and fall in love. mutual binding and interdependence.

In the end quote from cak nun "only silence that teaches us not to duplicate because after saturated with the sound you need a break in silence"